Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Millicent Gail Cole v. Andrew M. Saul
as 2:2019cv10787
Plaintiff:
Millicent Gail Cole
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Coles v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12531
Plaintiff:
Gail Coles
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Millicent Gail Cole v. Nancy A Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01167
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Millicent Gail Cole
Millicent Gail Cole v. Nancy A Berryhill
as 2:2017cv04394
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Millicent Gail Cole
Cole v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06563
Plaintiff:
Gail Cole
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04772
Plaintiff:
Marlene Alvarez , Rodolfo Alvarez , Lorelle Baker and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C. R. Bard, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-05796
Plaintiff:
Marlene Alvarez , Rodolfo Alvarez , Lorelle Baker and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Alvarez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05796
Plaintiff:
Marlene Alvarez , Rodolfo Alvarez , Lorelle Baker and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brenda Gail Cole v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00800
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gail Cole
Poplar #243838 v. Waite et al
as 1:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
Samuel Soloman Poplar #243838, Jr.
Defendant:
Sandy Waite, Gail Cole, Russ Bonnee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
