Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Tony Webster v. Kellen Williams, et al
as 23-3425
Plaintiff:
TONY WEBSTER
Defendant:
KELLEN WILLIAMS, JUSTIN GALL, SHAMAILA GORSI and others
Pete Taylor v. Nicholas Swise, et al
as 23-3093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETE EARL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS SWISE and JUSTIN GALL
Nanez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almendarez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Arthur Almendarez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvan v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
John Galvan
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Galles et al
as 1:2023cv02970
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Phillip Galles, Tyche Asset Management LLC, Tyche Master Fund LTD and others
Duncan v. Klepinger et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Paris A Duncan and Paris Andre Duncan
Defendant:
Casie Klepinger, Neil Johnson and R Gall
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CIC/CIF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Tony Webster
Defendant:
. Williams, . Gall, . Gousi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Martin v. Mike Galle, et al
as 22-1662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE GALLE, PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. and TRISTICA HOWARD
MARTIN v. GALLE et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN
Defendant:
MIKE GALLE, PENN NATIONAL GAMING, TRISTICA HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
