Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Yarborough v. Waddell
as 5:2023hc02279
Petitioner:
Garry Artis Yarborough
Respondent:
Stephen Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Franklin A. Morris
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Terrell T. Howard
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hucks v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Savannah Hucks
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Crystal Ballard, Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
ABARA JOHNSON, ANN HAYES, ANNIE SCOTT and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gilliland v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Haleem Gilliland
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Kyle Garrett Harris and Platte River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. USA
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
Garry Jermaine Alford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Samuels v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Byron Lamar Samuels, Jr
Defendant:
Garry McFadden, Roy Cooper, Kristin Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shine v. McFadden et al
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Kerry Adam Shine, Jr
Defendant:
Garry L McFadden, Mecklenburg County Jail Central and Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
