Cases 1 - 10 of 332
Moore *RESTRICTED FILER* v. Monroe County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Garry Lee Moore *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Facility, Monroe County, MS, Board of Supervisors, Kevon Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Deary v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deary
Defendant:
B. Collier, B. Reitsma, T. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vanvelzer v. Grewal et al
as 4:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
David Vanvelzer
Defendant:
Gursharn Singh Grewal and 1706718 Alberta LTD doing business as M. Garry Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
White v. Clements Unit Med Stf
as 24-10049
Plaintiff:
Garry W. White
Defendant:
Clements Unit Medical Staff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Gallardo
as 23-50878
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Garry David Gallardo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Test v. Defendant et al
as 1:2023cv22222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Test, Pretend Plaintiff and Garry NMI Moore DO NOT FILE
Defendant:
Test Defendant, New Defendant and Defendant Michael Test
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
