Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Smith v. City of San Francisco et al
as 5:2022cv08918
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, GEO Reentry Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Armstead et al
as 1:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Armstead, Lieutenant Goldman, Sergeant Rajah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE
as 1:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Smith v. Peete
as 4:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Gary L Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly Peete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Patuxent Institution
as 1:2020cv03373
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Tarrant County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv00549
Defendant:
Tarrant County Jail and Officer Snyner
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Smith v. Mmbrs of the US House of Rep, et al
as 16-5035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Members of the United States House of Representatives and Members of the United States Senate
SMITH v. MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2015cv01831
Plaintiff:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ousley et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gary L Smith
Defendant:
H Ousley, B Clayton, M Winklmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Smith v. McWilliams
as 09-7911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MCWILLIAMS, (FNU); in her individual capacity, MS. HOWARD, (FNU), in his own capacity, KELLY HECK, in her individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
