Cases 21 - 30 of 1,496
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron Pruitt, Homero Garza, Jeffrn Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Garza
as 4:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Tariq Hoffman
Respondent:
F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frederick, James v. County of Palm Beach et al
as 9:2024cv80058
Plaintiff:
James Tyrell Frederick
Defendant:
County of Palm Beach, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Michael Perard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04008
Plaintiff:
David Delgado
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mark Williams, Jason Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Garza
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Sye Newton
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garza v. Lubbock County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza, Jr.
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center, FNU Havran and FNU Reddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. C.O. Ms. Flores et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Garza
Defendant:
C.O. Ms. Flores, Larissa Wysocki, Beens Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Garza
as 1:2023cv02134
Petitioner:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baxton v. Garza
as 1:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
James Baxton
Defendant:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC)Garza v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv01723
Petitioner:
Angel M. Garza
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Bryan Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
