Cases 31 - 40 of 1,496
Garza v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
Noe Garza
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Garza
as 1:2023cv02057
Petitioner:
Clyde Jones
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garza, Juan v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Garza
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Jacob Cirian, Tom Craig and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 23-40657
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Fidencio Garza
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Whitehead v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whitehead
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sheriff Hans Miller, Lt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
