Cases 31 - 40 of 490
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nelson v. Wieneck et al
as 2:2022cv12051
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
James Wieneck, Steven Gaynor, Detroit Police Department and others
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hopkins v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Racine County, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
121eCommerce LLC v. TNG Worldwide, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv11878
Plaintiff:
121eCommerce LLC
Defendant:
TNG Worldwide, Inc and Lawrence Gaynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gaynor v. Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC
as 8:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Zaviea Gaynor
Defendant:
Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gaynor v. Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC
as 1:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Zaviea Gaynor
Defendant:
Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC and Empirian Villiage of Maryland. LLC doing business as Franklin PArk at Greenbelt Station
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nicholas Anderson v. D. Scott, et al
as 22-16086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS D. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SCOTT, #2251, J. BERMUDEZ, #1832, K. SHORE, #0102, Lt. and others
Gaynor et al v. Leite
as 9:2022cv80637
Counter Defendant:
Robert Gaynor and DLG Services Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Daniel Leite
Gaynor v. DLG Services Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv80636
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaynor
Defendant:
DLG Services Inc. and Daniel Leite
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
