Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Evans v. Miller et al
as 5:2017ct03102
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Hans Miller, Frederick Jefferies, Milkeala Marmelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
George R Evans
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Evans v. Groom, et al
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Michael Groom , City of Jacksonville, N.C. , Christopher Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al -
as 7:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al
as 5:2016ct03267
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evan et al v. Diners Club International Ltd et al
as 2:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Christine Evan and George A Evan
Defendant:
Diners Club International Ltd and Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Evans v. City of Jacksonville, North Carolina et al
as 5:2016ct03092
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans, Sr
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, North Carolina, Michael Yaniero, Jason Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Capps et al
as 7:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, William Richardson, Jason Weisinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Evans, Sr. v. Officer Jason Grie
as 15-7709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JASON GRIESS, OFFICER FUNCKE, OFFICER EHRLER and others
George Evans v. Deputy Croft
as 15-7266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE R. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY CROFT, SERGEANT POTTER and CAPTAIN JEFFRIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
