Cases 51 - 60 of 70
EVANS v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER ET AL
as 1:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, B.J. BARNES, LANIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evans v. Guilford County Detention Center et al
as 7:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Guilford County Detention Center, B.J. Barnes, Lanier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evans v. Britt, et al
as 7:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
S.C. Britt, Lanksford Protective Services, Sam Lanksford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evans v. Griffin, et al
as 7:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
J.K. Griffin, Ken Miller, Robbie Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Evan v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
George A Evan
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Benito Santiago v. George Evan
as 12-16518
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BENITO SANTIAGO
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE M.. EVANS
Evans v. Wallens Ridge State Prison
as 7:2012cv00558
Plaintiff:
George Lee Evans
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Evans et al
as 6:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Benito Santiago
Defendant:
George M. Evans and Bennybeth & J Jr's Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
In re: George M. Evan
as 12-80008
Respondent:
In re: GEORGE MICHAEL EVANS, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 9, 1999
Evan et al v. Fry's Electronics Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
George A Evan and Christine Evan
Defendant:
Fry's Electronics Inc and Citicorp Diners Club Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
