Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ray v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00681
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: George A. Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
George Ray v. First Natl Bank of Omaha
as 10-3582
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE E. RAY
Defendant - Appellee: FIRST NATL BANK OF OMAHA, JP MORGAN CHASE NATL BANK and WELLS FARGO
George Ray v. Maggie Miller-Stout
as 10-35115
Petitioner - Appellant: GEORGE MICHAEL RAY
Respondent - Appellee: MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
George Ray v. First Natl Bank Omaha, et al
as 10-1001
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE E. RAY
Defendant - Appellee: FIRST NATL BANK OMAHA, ET AL., JP MORGAN CHASE NATL BANK and WELLS FARGO
George A. Ray v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83459
Plaintiff: George A. Ray
Defendant: A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Ray v. Miller-Stout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05470
Petitioner: George Michael Ray
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA et al
as 2:2009cv02845
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. RAY
Defendant: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA , J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL BANK and WELLS FARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Ray v. Fed Ins Co/Chubb
as 09-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE E. RAY
Defendant - Appellee: FED INS CO/CHUBB
RAY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OMAHA et al
as 2:2008cv03222
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. RAY
Defendant: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OMAHA and GLOBAL ACCEPTANCE CREDIT COMPANY, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?