Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04166
Plaintiff: George Hill
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSARIO v. GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01238
Plaintiff: LUIS ROSARIO, ROSARIO, LUIS A RESARIO LUIS ANGEL and CRUZ, JOSE LOUIS RESARIO LUIS
Defendant: GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Dewald, II v. Warden Lackawanna County Priso, et al
as 20-1638
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN LACKAWANNA COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID E DEWALD, II and DAVID E. DEWALD, II
TILLERY v. DR. RONALD PHILLIPS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05064
Plaintiff: RASHEEM TILLERY
Defendant: DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, DAVID BYRNES, MARIEL TRIMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anwar Ali v. Warden George Hill Correctiona
as 19-1454
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner / Appellant: ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07342
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HAY v. GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv03214
Defendant: GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN D. HAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOPERNA v. GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (GEO)
as 2:2018cv03036
Defendant: GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (GEO)
Plaintiff: JOHN EDWARD KOPERNA, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EZEKIAL v. FIVE BELOW, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00453
Defendant: JOEL D. ANDERSON, GEORGE HILL, FIVE BELOW, INC. and others
Plaintiff: BRANDON K. EZEKIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 3:2017cv00361
Plaintiff: Michael George Hill
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?