Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jones v. ESO Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Essie Jones, Essie McVay, Larry Claybo and others
Defendant:
ESO Solutions, Inc., Robert Day, George Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
REYES ALBERTO v. SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT LLC
as 1:2022cv03094
Plaintiff:
WENDY JUDITH REYES ALBERTO
Defendant:
SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT LLC and GEORGE SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simpson v. Maynor
as 5:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Anthony George Simpson
Respondent:
Timothy D. Maynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Maynor
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Simpson
Defendant:
Timothy D. Maynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Maynor et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Simpson
Defendant:
FNU Maynor and April Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Columbia, City of et al
as 3:2021cv04085
Plaintiff:
Sherman Green
Defendant:
City of Columbia, George Simpson and Columbia, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simpson v. Perritt et al
as 5:2020ct03108
Defendant:
Brad Perritt and George Baysden, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson et al v. OSI Restaurant Partners LLC et al
as 9:2016cv03907
Plaintiff:
Margaret Simpson and George Simpson
Defendant:
OSI Restaurant Partners LLC , Outback Steakhouse of Florida LLC and Bloomin' Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpson v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
George Simpson
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Westside Orthopaedic Clinic et al
as 1:2011dp23098
Plaintiff:
Linda Simpson and George Simpson
Defendant:
Mark Starring and Associates, Inc. , Mark Starring , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
