Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv05338
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. and Galeo Latino Community Development Fund, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff:
The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner:
District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Lower Muskogee Creek Tribe, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Georgia Republican Party, Inc., National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv05018
Plaintiff:
National Republican Senatorial Committee, Perdue for Senate, Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc., DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia
Amicus Curiae:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP and Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Twelfth Congressional District Republican Committee et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, Terence Dicks, Anh Lee and others
Plaintiff:
The Twelfth Congressional District Republican Committee, Cathy A. Latham, Edward T. Metz and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, DSCC, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. (GCPA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv04651
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
L. Lin Wood, Jr.
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, James Woodall, Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Mahoney,III et al.,
as 4:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Thomas Mahoney, III, Patricia Pullar, Tim McFalls and others
Plaintiff:
James Martin, III, Nicole Martin, Rebecca Brooks and others
Not Yet Classified:
James Woodall, Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gwinnett County NAACP et al v. Gwinnett County Board of Registration and Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00912
Defendant:
Charlotte Nash, Ben Satterfield, Alice O'Lenick and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, Inc. and Gwinnett County NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, Inc. et al v. Kemp
as 1:2018cv04727
Plaintiff:
Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, Inc., Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brian Kemp
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. City of LaGrange, Georgia
as 3:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP , Troup County NAACP , Project South and others
Defendant:
City of LaGrange, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
