Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Snelson, Jeremy v. Wilson, Derek et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Snelson
Defendant:
Derek S. Wilson, Randal F. Wojciehoski, Daniel Lavoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Dept of Correction et al
as 2:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
Kareen Hayes
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Stacy Pasbrig, Jessica Giza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Walter v. Reimer, et al.
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Mrs. Reimer, Reed Richardson, J. Achterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giza v. Arnold et al
as 3:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Giza
Defendant:
Arnold and Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giza v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Giza
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Warlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone v. Mills et al
as 3:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Deruggieo, Giza, Sgt. D Hewett and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Mahone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Walter v. Pugh, Jeffrey et al
as 3:2019cv00947
Defendant:
T. Brunnerk, Mrs. Reimer, Sgt. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd Francis v. United States Department of Ho, et al
as 15-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION and PETE GIZAS, DHS/ICE Special Agent
FRANCIS v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2014cv05176
Plaintiff:
FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BOARDER PROTECTION and PETE GIZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandy et al v. Schneider et al
as 2:2014cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rickey James Grandy
Defendant:
Jesse Schneider , William Pollard, Sgt Giza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
