Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robinson v. Braswell et al
as 5:2024ct03083
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Braswell, Officer Paul, Sgt. Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giddings v. Kleinbord et al
as 1:2021cv02132
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Brian S. Kleinbord, Hannah Gleason, Judge Gary Bair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Giddings v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv01958
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland, Charles County Probation Officer 1, Charles County Probation Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Giddings v. Bair et al
as 1:2021cv00706
Defendant:
Judge Gary Bair and Hannah Gleason
Plaintiff:
Warren Matthew Giddings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mungro v. Tate et al
as 3:2020cv00605
Defendant:
Kevin Tate, John Gleason, PSI Agent and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Mungro, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gleason v. MacDonald
as 7:2019cv00843
Defendant:
Stephanie MacDonald
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jerome Gleaton
as 16-6773
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEROME DANEK GLEATON, a/k/a Jerome Danek Gleatin, a/k/a Jerome Gleason, a/k/a Ronnie
Brouckaert v. Jamaludeen et al
as 1:2015cv01166
Plaintiff:
Ryan Brouckaert
Defendant:
Abdul Jamaludeen, Deputy Lowe, Deputy Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gleason v. George Janice
as 13-7776
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL GLEASON
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE JANICE, Warden, Stevens Correctional Center
Respondent:
HONORABLE DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General
Gleason v. Janice et al
as 3:2013cv00061
Petitioner:
Michael Gleason
Respondent:
George Janice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
