Cases 11 - 20 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv04464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
BACH v. GLEASON
as 5:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE BACH
Defendant:
RICHARD GLEASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Sharon Gleason, et al
as 22-35446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff:
ALASKA NATIVE CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON L. GLEASON, JONAS M. WALKER, BRYAN SCHRODER and others
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Prew v. Gleason
as 4:2022cv10898
Plaintiff:
Ashley Prew
Defendant:
John Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. City of Concord, et al
as 22-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUY SWANGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv10385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
