Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Sill v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Glen Davis Sill
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Beckley ARH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Marcum et al v. Messer et al
as 2:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Austin Marcum, Elizabeth Muncy and Alexis Vance
Defendant:
Glen Messer, Alan Mounts and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Persinger et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Glen Michael Persinger and Sara Jane Persinger
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell et al v. American Electric Power
as 2:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Glen Mitchell, Glenda Mitchell, J. M. and others
Defendant:
American Electric Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abshire et al v. CitiFinancial Credit Company et al
as 1:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Nancy Pearl Abshire and Glen A. Abshire
Defendant:
CitiFinancial Credit Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Jeremy Rollman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00584
Plaintiff:
Glen Scott Jenkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Eric Glen Evans
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carder et al v. Hoveround Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner and others
Defendant:
Hoveround Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Ables v. WVDOCR et al
as 5:2020cv00245
Defendant:
WVDOCR and Betsy C. Jividen
Plaintiff:
David Glen Ables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ables v. WVDOCR et al
as 5:2020cv00233
Defendant:
WVDOCR and Betsy Jividen
Plaintiff:
David Glen Ables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
