Cases 11 - 20 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00069
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Mark Brnovich
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glen Johnson, et al v. Charps Welding & Fabricating,, et al
as 19-1206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bill Patt, Trustee of the Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Mark Ryan, Trustee of the Local #49 International Union of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program, Glen Johnson, Trustee of the Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Charps Welding & Fabricating, Inc., Kenneth Charpentier, Clearwater Energy Group, Inc., formerly known as C&G Holding Company of Clearbrook, Inc. and others
SHAFFER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00459
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, DEBBIE OXLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNELIUS v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv05062
Plaintiff:
PRESTON D CORNELIUS
Defendant:
Glen Johnson, DUSTER, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. JOHNSON
as 3:2018cv00139
Petitioner:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Respondent:
GLEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Johnson
as 1:2018cv04872
Petitioner:
Eddie James King
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walden v. Johnson
as 1:2018cv04387
Petitioner:
James Mickey Walden
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
