Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones, Jr. v. Oak Park, City of et al
as 2:2015cv12968
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Oak Park, City of, Centerline, City of, Steve Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Avanzato et al
as 1:2014cv02044
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Avanzato, Supple, Hasen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Connolly et al
as 1:2013cv06355
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
William J. Connolly, Joseph Avanzato, Dave Scaturro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Putnam Hospital Center et al
as 1:2013cv05370
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Putnam Hospital Center, Nili Gujadhur, Michael Capicotto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Jones v. Moorjani et al
as 1:2013cv02247
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Harish Moorjani, Sundaram Ravikumar and Mount Vernon Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2012cv03604
Plaintiff:
Darian Fisher and LaParker Smith
Defendant:
Dallas County , Shannon Brown , Dallas County Commissioner's Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Midelton et al
as 1:2012cv02087
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Gary Midelton, Supple, Ahmed Asif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Preempative Forensic Health Solutions
as 6:2011cv03551
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Preempative Forensic Health Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JONES et al v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80844
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JONES , SANDRA MORGAN , TIMOTHY JONES, JR. and others
Defendant:
AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, COLONIAL SUGAR REFINING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
