Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Marquart v. City of Shaniko et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Zachary Forrest Marquart
Defendant:
City of Shaniko, David R. Long, Diana L. Marrs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Raybon v. U.S. Federal Court
as 5:2023cv04141
Petitioner:
Goldy Raybon
Respondent:
U.S. Federal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clarke v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Eleni Kounalakis, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kerrou v. Bonifant et al
as 3:2021cv05408
Plaintiff:
Mohssine Kerrou
Defendant:
James A Bonifant, Goldis Farhadi and Bibi M Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Associated Systems Application Professionals, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09101
Defendant:
Eddies Bookstores, Inc., Goldie Book Stores, Inc., Hideaway Books, Inc. doing business as Folsom Gulch and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Goldie Theresha Franklin-Lacoq v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01829
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Theresha Franklin Franklin - Lacoq and Goldie Theresha Franklin-Lacoq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ausef v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020at00387
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Golnaz Goldie Ausef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(SS) Ausef v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Golnaz Goldie Ausef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
