Cases 1 - 10 of 41
United States of America v. Ayers
as 26-2076
Defendant:
BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN, DERRICK AYERS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Kennedy)
as 26-1531
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Harrell)
as 26-1478
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Wright)
as 26-1420
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv20265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Clarke)
as 25-1869
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, NIA GOVAN, BERMON CLARKE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Goodluck v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Avery Goodluck
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mattel, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv07048
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ShuanQ, SHERELLA and others
Plaintiff:
Mattel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Goodluck v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv06950
Plaintiff:
John Goodluck
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TAYLOR v. SUNSEA ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
MARIBETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
SUNSEA ENERGY LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY NJ, LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
