Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Thomas
Defendant:
Kimberly Reynolds, Charles Grassley and Joni E. Ernst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Depper v. Grassley
as 4:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Bobby Depper
Defendant:
Chuck Grassley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv04876
Defendant:
Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv02745
Defendant:
Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxine Shepard v. Department Of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAXINE SHEPARD
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, SECRETARY DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD AUSTIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
