Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CHAPMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34079
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Chapman, et al v. Ace American Insurance Company
as 18-12972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK CHAPMAN, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Gregory Chapman, deceased, and the Estate of Barbara Chapman, deceased and IRENE CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation f.k.a. Cigna Insurance Company
Gregory Chapman v. United States Parole Commissio
as 16-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Chapman v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2015cv02350
Plaintiff:
Gregory Chapman
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hannibal Buchanan v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 15-7181
Petitioner - Appellant:
HANNIBAL TYR KONR BUCHANAN, a/k/a Paul Gregory Chapman
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Chapman v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05475
Plaintiff:
Gregory Chapman
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Frank v. Chapman et al
as 9:2013cv00043
Petitioner:
Cindy Ann Frank
Defendant:
Gregory Chapman, Montana Back and Rehabilitation Institute and Pro Adjuster Chiropractic Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Paul Chapman v. Harold Clarke
as 12-8067
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL GREGORY CHAPMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Chapman v. Clarke
as 1:2012cv00332
Petitioner:
Paul Gregory Chapman
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
