Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LEATHERS et al v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Leathers and Robert Jeffrey Rhodes
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, ZACHARY SAMS, Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tazul Islam v. Mock Gregory Clay, et al.
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Tazul Islam
Defendant:
Mock Gregory Clay, Joe Rud Trucking, Inc., DOES 1-50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Tazul Islam v. Mock Grecory Clay et al
as 2:2023cv04611
Plaintiff:
Payton Kashani and Tazul Islam
Defendant:
Mock Gregory Clay, Joe Rud Trucking, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Tazul Islam v. Mock Grecory Clay et al
as 5:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Tazul Islam
Defendant:
Mock Gregory Clay, Joe Rud Trucking, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08640
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORIE CLAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riddle v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2019cv06127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Riddle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arguello et al v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Raymond Arguello , Gregory Clay , Novella Clay and others
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque , Ray Schultz , Bernalillo County and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Bernalillo County , David Linthicum and Duncan Sanchez
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee et al
as 1:2010cv00070
Defendant:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Claimant:
Gregory Clay and Marie Linda Weatherhead
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
