Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Ajanaku Murdock v. Jack McClelland
as 20-7305
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK MCCLELLAND, HASSAN, Department of Public Safety, NURSE DIXON, Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AJANAKU E. MURDOCK
Defendant:
HAINES, Physician
Jones v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2020cv00086
Defendant:
Frank Lawrence, John Baldwin, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Haynes et al
as 3:2018cv00575
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes, Kimberly D. Grand, Rubin Young and others
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Fox
Cole v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00403
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes, North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dontray Cole
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. Perry et al
as 3:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stanley Corbett, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, Paula Smith, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ridgeway v. Chavis et al
as 5:2016ct03186
Plaintiff:
Avenger Don Ridgeway
Defendant:
Patsy Chavis, Officer Brewer and Gregory Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CROWLEY et al
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIEL CROWLEY, MOFFITT, GREGORY HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roberts and Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Wethington, James Wethington, Robert S. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
