Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Gregory Ward
as 17-30243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY M. WARD, also known as Gregory Ward
Eugene Douglas, Jr. v. Gary Maynard
as 12-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DOUGLAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner and others
Douglas v. Maynard et al
as 8:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Dept of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Murphey v. Gary Maynard
as 09-6873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. MURPHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MAYNARD, Secy-DPSCS, JOHN ROWLEY, Commissioner of Corrections, KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, ECI and others
Defendant - None:
DAVID C. DONAVAN, Dr., CHARLES MEEHAM, Staff PRISM, STEPHEN MEEHAM, Staff PRISM and others
Scott Ward v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-50284
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT GREGORY WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ward v. White
as 7:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ward
Defendant:
Neicko White
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Alton, III v. Doctor Mathis
as 08-6778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. ALTON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR MATHIS, M.D., MARYAM MESSAFORTH, P.A., KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A. and others
Ward v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00394
Petitioner:
Scott Gregory Ward
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alton et al v. Mathis et al
as 8:2007cv01499
Plaintiff:
William E. Alton, Charles Fletcher, Kevin Glasscho and others
Defendant:
Mathis, Maryam Messaforth, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
