Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keister v. Wake County District Attorney Office et al
as 8:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Francis Keister
Defendant:
Lorrin Freeman, City of Raleigh, The Raleigh NC Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bailey v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
James Bailey
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Jordan v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al
as 23-55647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC., PERYIS YUVONTE RICHARD BLAIN and JAMES HAROLD DEMPSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
SIMS v. GREYHOUND MAINTENANCE CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv02149
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE SIMS
Defendant:
GREYHOUND MAINTENANCE CENTER and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
GHEE v. FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL GHEE and SAMUEL GHEE, IV
Defendant:
FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC, GREYHOUND LINES INC, GORGE MORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
