Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gross et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
David Gross and Charles A. russell
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Prince George's County Police Department, Malik Aziz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Gross et al v. Dodson et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Laslo Gross and Susan L. Gross
Defendant:
Nick Dodson, Mike Dodson, David Claassen and others
US v. James Gross, Sr.
as 24-6017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ELMER GROSS, SR., a/k/a Stink
Bey et al v. Landon et al
as 8:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bolden Bey and Leonie Bolden Bey
Defendant:
Bill Landon, Stanley C. Middleman, Jefferey B. Lown, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Deritis et al
as 4:2023cv06274
Plaintiff:
Austin Ryan Moore
Defendant:
Nicholas Deritis, Dana Crowell, Emerson L. Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lyons v. Darby et al
as 8:2023cv03085
Defendant:
Perry Matthew Darby, P. Matthew Darby, Matthew Darby and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv01580
Petitioner:
Troy Gross, Sr.
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robert A Leak et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Leak, Robert Glenn Hodgson, Steve Knowles, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
