Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Adame et al v. Cactus Drilling Company LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Rolando Adame, Adan Chavez, Victor Manuel Perez Barragan and others
Defendant: Cactus Drilling Company LLC and Christopher Eugnen Akin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Karla Guadalupe Gonzalez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv09160
Plaintiff: Karla Guadalupe Gonzalez
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1188
Petitioner: JOSE GUADALUPE GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01725
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Santoyo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-178
Petitioner: LUZ MARIA LOPEZ SANTOYO, MARIA DE JESUS GONZALEZ LOPEZ and MARIA GUADALUPE GONZALEZ LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morena Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1194
Petitioner: MORENA GUADALUPE GONZALEZ and Y.J.L.G.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?