Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 20-2212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Steven Moffitt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Timothy M. Pratt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, William Burrell, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc. and Cellular Sales of New York, LLC
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LL
as 20-2037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gurwinder Singh, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jason Mack, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jan P. Holick, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Cellular Sales of New York, LLC and Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01009
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gurwinder Singh v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60273
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
GURWINDER SINGH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00233
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10594
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gurwinder Singh v. William Barr
as 19-73058
Petitioner:
GURWINDER SINGH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05679
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gurwinder Singh v. William Barr
as 19-72256
Petitioner:
GURWINDER SINGH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Wolfe v. A.M. Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Gurwinder Singh and A.M. Trucking, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wanda J. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
