Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Baccus v. Byars et al
as 9:2013cv02309
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Larry Cartledge, N C Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, H M Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A Wilson, H B Richardson, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
W Nettles, R Carter, J Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Daniel v. Hines et al
as 1:2010cv02757
Plaintiff:
Kara Daniel
Defendant:
Derrick Hines, Basic Trucking, LLC, R and H Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman v. Hancock et al
as 3:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
James Bowman
Defendant:
H. F. Hancock, Marice and Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian Rochester v. H. Herlong
as 09-7522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
H. M. HERLONG, R. S. CARR, H. F. FLOYD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
