Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Gilmore v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00308
Petitioner:
Cynthia Gilmore
Respondent:
Warden, Warden Lovette, H.L. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demos v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Brandstatt v. Clark
as 1:2022cv01193
Petitioner:
William H.L. Brandstatt
Respondent:
Kenneth Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
H.L. et al v. Porter County et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mezzacapo, H.L., A.G. and others
Defendant:
Porter County, Portage Police Department, Lightfoot Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Ray
as 6:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Decarlos Markese Mickles
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Ray et al
as 6:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jamar D. Green
Defendant:
H.L. Ray, FCI Manchester and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Green v. Ray
as 6:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jamar Dominic Green
Defendant:
Active Warden H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Brandstatt v. Clark
as 1:2022cv00299
Petitioner:
William H.L. Brandstatt
Respondent:
Kenneth Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Ray
as 6:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Jason T. Gay
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
