Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Brandon Goodwin v. N.D.C.S. Medical, et al
as 24-1067
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Goodwin
Defendant:
N.D.C.S. Medical, Keith P. Hughes, M.D., hired surgeon, Individual capacity, Southwest Lincoln Surgery Center and others
MORENO et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
ALMA MORENO, AMINAH HAWLEY, ANNETTE KRAVITZ and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HAITH et al v. HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00856
Plaintiff:
ERICA CHAMBERS, JAMYA HAITH and EMMONIE HAITH
Defendant:
HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC., THE HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NC CHAMPIONS CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10208
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HAITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51564
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HAITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Oliver et al
as 5:2020cv03078
Plaintiff:
Fisher and Joseph Ray Fisher
Defendant:
Oliver, (fnu) Ingalsbe, (fnu) Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22576
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL R HAITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
