Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hashim Muhammad v. Riverside County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2026cv03797
Plaintiff:
Hashim Muhammad
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Deputy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00725
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HANDY v. USA
as 1:2026cv00614
Petitioner:
YOSEF AMIEL HANDY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Karpinski v. Handi-Foil Corp. et al
as 2:2026cv06981
Plaintiff:
Charles Karpinski
Defendant:
Handi-Foil Corp. and HFA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Handy Arreaga-Vivar v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-2559
Petitioner:
HANDY ALBERTO ARREAGA-VIVAR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Access Point Financial, LLC v. Wolfgramm et al
as 1:2026cv03422
Plaintiff:
Access Point Financial, LLC
Defendant:
Phillip Tufui Wolfgramm, Koloa Haafuluhao Wolfgramm and Russell Clive Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HANDY v. US BOP
as 1:2026cv00542
Petitioner:
YOSEF AMIEL HANDY
Respondent:
US BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. HANDY MAAM HOME SERVICES LLC
as 5:2026cv03247
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
HANDY MAAM HOME SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
APF - CRE III, LLC v. Wolfgramm et al
as 1:2026cv02644
Plaintiff:
APF - CRE III, LLC
Defendant:
Philip Tufui Wolfgramm, Koloa Haafuluhao Wolfgramm and Russell Clive Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Belcastro v. Boskovich et al
as 2:2026cv01361
Plaintiff:
Terry Belcastro
Defendant:
Ronni M. Boskovich, D. Brundag, c/o Colunga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
