Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Handi Technology Inc v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv05130
Defendant:
Rodney S. Scott, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States
Plaintiff:
Handi Technology Inc
Spears v. County of El Dorado, et al.
as 26-7461
Defendant:
SUSANNA KURK, EDCJ Dentist, GARCIA, HANDY and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SPEARS
Smith v. Boudreaux et al
as 2:2026cv02506
Defendant:
Gerald Turlich, Bridget Williams, John Wigstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Keiatca Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Handy v. State Of Texas
as 4:2026cv09197
Petitioner:
Christopher Handy
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Cavins et al
as 3:2026cv01431
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
J. Cavins, Nurse Carol, C/O Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yang & Chang International, a California Corporation v. Orlando Garcia et al
as 5:2026cv05978
Plaintiff:
Yang & Chang International, a California Corporation
Defendant:
Orlando Garcia, Center for Disability Access, Potter Handy LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Handy v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv02289
Plaintiff:
Thomas Handy
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Handy v. United States of America
as 9:2026cv00158
Plaintiff:
Trevor Allen Handy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Handy v. Ebke et al
as 1:2026cv01262
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Handy
Defendant:
Sgt. Ebke, S/Cpl Wharton and John Doe Officers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
