Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HANDY et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2026cv11582
Petitioner:
AARON HANDY, LANCE SMITH, EDWIN SANTIAGO and others
Respondent:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY and HUDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HANDY v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv06315
Plaintiff:
NIKITA M. HANDY
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Finnerty v. Baily et al
as 1:2026cv03293
Plaintiff:
Alex C Finnerty
Defendant:
Willem Baily, Kolacz Arkadivszk, Milo Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. Handy et al
as 3:2026cv05855
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Dave Handy, K Rago and Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kindell v. Grove et al
as 8:2026cv02159
Plaintiff:
Korey L. Kindell
Defendant:
Kevin Grove, Tampa Police Samatha Compton, Tampa Police Zachary Ploch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hashim Muhammad v. Riverside County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2026cv03797
Plaintiff:
Hashim Muhammad
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Deputy Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00725
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HANDY v. USA
as 1:2026cv00614
Petitioner:
YOSEF AMIEL HANDY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Charles Karpinski v. Handi-Foil Corp. et al
as 2:2026cv06981
Plaintiff:
Charles Karpinski
Defendant:
Handi-Foil Corp., HFA, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
