Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2024cv02485
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Grace
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jamie Elliott
Defendant:
Lt. Grace, Sgt. Weavering, C.O.I. Harmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv03791
Plaintiff:
AKHENATON JONES
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GREGORY VRATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Harmer v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
OWENS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCH CARNEY, LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmer v. Progressive Universal Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Danielle Harmer and Danielle M. Harmer
Defendant:
Progressive Universal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HARMER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
