Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Miller v. Chevron USA
as 24-30204
Plaintiff:
Sandra Miller, on behalf of Harold Miller
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, Marathon Oil Company and Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.
Progressive Insurance Company v. Explicit Wear Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10726
Plaintiff:
Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant:
Explicit Wear Inc., Harold Miller and Jakarrie Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Miller v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02262
Plaintiff:
Harold Miller
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04636
Plaintiff:
Julie Miller and Harold Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15766
Plaintiff:
Murice Miller and Harold Miller
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv34002
Plaintiff:
Patricia Miller and Harold Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Zimmer, Inc, et al
as 1:2013cv05060
Plaintiff:
Harold Miller and Margaret Miller
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. Zimmer, Inc, et al
as 2:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
Harold Miller and Margaret Miller
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75161
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HAROLD MILLER
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
