Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Wadford v. Watts et al
as 5:2015cv00622
Plaintiff:
Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr.
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Bureau of Prisons S.E. Regional Office, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davilla v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davilla
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, D. Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. WATTS et al
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
James Coury Holmes
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, John V. Flournoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wadford v. Watts et al
as 5:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr.
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, John/Jane Doe, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wadford v. Watts, et al
as 5:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr.
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, John Doe, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lugo-Velez v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Lugo-Velez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Harrell Watts, W. T. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosales v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Javier Rosales
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, John V. Flournoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Rich et al
as 5:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Tony Lenald Ford
Defendant:
Aaron Rich, H. J. Manberry, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eduardo R. Perez
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, Suzanne R. Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
