Cases 21 - 30 of 662
Staples v. USA et al
as 1:2016cv01284
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
USA , Charles Samuel , Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Staples v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Charles Samuel, Jr, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv03136
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. Terry O'Brien, et al
as 16-2878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, ROBERT E. BRINSON, M. BOYD and others
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv12367
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Ford v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tony Lenald Ford
Defendant:
Tamyra Jarvis, H. J. Manberry, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Buford, III v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 16-2671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WILLIE BUFORD, III
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Love Brooks v. Bryan Bledsoe, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOVE ALTONIO BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, HUDSON, Associate Warden, S. SNYDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
