Cases 1 - 10 of 476
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner:
Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent:
State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hatcher v. Griffin et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Griffin, Ballew, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maximo Gomez v. Danielle Key, et al
as 24-11007
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J. HATCHER
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE KEY KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maximo Gomez v. Danielle Key, et al
as 24-10786
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J. HATCHER
Hatcher v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
as 7:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Quashawn Akeem Hatcher
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Eckhart et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Michael Eckhart and Peter Zenuti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Eckhart et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Respondent:
Michael Eckhart, Peter Zenuti and Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Valentine et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Hatcher
Respondent:
Warden Ann Valentine and Attorney General Russel Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Joush Hatcher, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
