Cases 41 - 50 of 829
Garry Edwards v. Kentucky Family Court, et al
as 23-5518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRY DEWAYNE EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY FAMILY COURT, Kentucky Court of Justice, KENT HENDRICKSON, Kentucky Family Court Judge, JANE ADAMS VENTERS, Kentucky Family Court Judge and others
Hayes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hayes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. KY Family Court et al
as 6:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Garry Dewayne Edwards
Defendant:
KY Family Court, Jane Venters, Kent Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edwards v. KY Family Court et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Garry Dewayne Edwards
Defendant:
KY Family Court, Jane Venters, Kent Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Gerald Hayes
as 23-3252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD ALAN HAYES
Pipkin v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County Sheriff Department, Sgt. Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson et al v. Hayes et al
as 2:2023cv10584
Plaintiff:
O'Neil D Swanson and Dianne Swanson
Defendant:
Robert M Hayes, Dana Nessel and Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Wright & Filippis, LLC
as 2:2023cv10438
Plaintiff:
Brooke Hayes and Heather Randall
Defendant:
Wright & Filippis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Giles et al v. Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
David Giles, Morgan Brey, Matt Dotson and others
Defendant:
Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC and MARK MINTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
