Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Newberry v. McMaster
as 1:2024cv03397
Defendant:
Michael J. Prodan and Henry McMaster
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Santos v. Khoury et al
as 0:2024cv03381
Defendant:
Governor Henry McMaster, Judge Coreen Khoury, Tripp Rush and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynesworth v. Garvin et al
as 2:2024cv03042
Defendant:
Lisa Young, Mr. Albrit, Leonka Garvin and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breyan v. Henry McMaster et al
as 2:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Breyan
Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff:
CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
Uygur et al v. South Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Cenk Uygur and John Ward
Defendant:
South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. McMaster et al
as 9:2023cv06604
Petitioner:
Bennie Mitchell
Respondent:
Henry McMaster and Warden Stephen Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
