Cases 1 - 10 of 760
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Wurster et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
James E Fuller
Defendant:
. Wurster, Tessa Derby, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Cordell Deonzio Hinton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2024ct03088
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Josh Stein and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50061
Plaintiff:
Travionte Williams
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Dr. J. Chess, Dr. M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. United States Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Charles E. Hinton
Respondent:
United States Incorporated, Roy A. Cooper, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britten v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Clarence Britten
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes, Illinois Department of Corrections Administrative Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10482
Petitioner:
James Hinton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
