Cases 31 - 40 of 40
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (JAMES YOUNG)
as 1:2010cv05204
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (GEORGE T. RODGERS)
as 1:2010cv05203
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE T. RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (CEDRIC ROYAL)
as 1:2010cv05205
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC ROYAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION(DAVID GILL)
as 1:2010cv02826
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jeffrey Hoagland
as 10-15347
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY CHARLES HOAGLAND
USA v. Jeffrey Hoagland
as 10-15300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY CHARLES HOAGLAND
Robinson v. USP Hazelton et al
as 2:2009cv00102
Petitioner:
Carlose D. Robinson
Respondent:
USP Hazelton , Federal Bureau of Prisons , N. Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: O
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (Brian Hardy)
as 1:2009cv03739
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HARDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoagland v. USA
as 4:2009cv00013
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Hoagland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Leniart v. Bundy et al
as 3:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
George M. Leniart
Defendant:
William Bundy, Wilfred J. Blanchette, III, Michael Hoagland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
