Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Eads v. Cheney et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Eads
Defendant:
Dr. Dave Cheney and Stanley Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REED, et al. v. LONG, et al.
as 5:2019cv00385
Defendant:
JEANETTE RILEY, GARY LONG and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
COREY MCCLENDON, CHRISTOPHER REED and REGINALD HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDEN v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 4:2019cv00144
Plaintiff:
NELLIE HOLDEN
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Pierce County, Georgia et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Pierce County, Georgia, Ramsey Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holden et al v. United States District Court Southern District Of Georgia Probation Office
as 2:2018cv00128
Defendant:
United States District Court Southern District Of Georgia Probation Office
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holden and Rachel Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLDEN v. SATCHELL et al
as 1:2018cv00198
Respondent:
EVONNE MULL, SANDRA SATCHELL, SAM LAW and others
Petitioner:
JOE WILLIAM HOLDEN, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRENSHAW et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CRENSHAW , OZZIE BROWN , LUCILLE BURKS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holden v. Mckeown et al
as 4:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Brian O. Holden
Defendant:
Christopher Mckeown, Rob Shore, Michael Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holden v. Glenda's Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Melynda Holden
Defendant:
Glenda's Inc. and Glenda Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
