Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Smith v. Davis et al
as 7:2026cv00270
Petitioner:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Respondent:
Davis and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 25-7841
Plaintiff:
HOLLY D. SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Smith v. Butler
as 6:2025cv01049
Petitioner:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith, et al v. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 25-1076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN J SMITH and HOLLY M SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NICOLE BRIGGS, KOPP and others
Smith, et al v. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 24-1490
Defendant:
TASK FORCES, both sherrifs and GJPD task forces, swat teams, BRAUHM, SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN J SMITH and HOLLY M SMITH
Smith v. Birmingham City Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv01288
Defendant:
Birmingham City Police Department and Birmingham Fire and Rescue Department
Plaintiff:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Holly D. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Holly Lou Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Smith v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Tidwell, QCHC Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
