Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Warren v. Handy et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tinika SeCal Warren and Tinika Se'Cal Warren
Defendant:
Maurice Handy, Regina Montgromery, Lynn Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Maryland Department HUD
as 8:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams
Defendant:
Maryland Department HUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice
as 23-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISTELLA RICE and NEWPORT NEWS REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant:
MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, KELLY BRUNSON and STUART GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Long v. New River Valley Community Services Pact Program et al
as 7:2019cv00171
Plaintiff:
Garry V. Long
Defendant:
HUD Housing US Govt Sec 8 and New River Valley Community Services Pact Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sharrock v. Fayetteville Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 5:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Rita Sharrock
Defendant:
Fayetteville Metropolitan Housing Authority Board, Dawn Driggers, Brenda Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
