Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Elizabeth Sines v. Jason Kessler
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff: TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellee: JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Defendant: MICHAEL ENOCH PEINOVICH
Amicus Curiae: HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Nathan Damigo
as 23-1122
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff: TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN DAMIGO
Defendant: JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae: HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Michael Hill
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff: TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL TUBBS and LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH
Defendant: RICHARD SPENCER, JASON KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae: HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
John and Jane Parents 1 v. Montgomery County Board of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN AND JANE PARENTS 1 and JOHN PARENT 2
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, SHEBRA L. EVANS, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education, BRENDA WOLFF, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education and others
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE, DR. ERICA E. ANDERSON, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00620
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tennessee et al v. United States Department of Education et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00308
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Association of Christian Schools International, A.S., C.F. and others
Amicus Curiae: Women's Human Rights Campaign and Women's Declaration International USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DOE et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2021cv01480
Plaintiff: ALIN DOE, JANE DOE and POOR PEOPLE'S ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
Defendant: SECRETARY MARCIA FUDGE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and BLM COMPANIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HONKALA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00725
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, AND TWO MINORS, JENNIFER BENNETCH, POOR PEOPLE'S ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and MARCIA FUDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HONKALA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00684
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, JANE DOE II, POOR PEOPLE'S ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant: BEN CARSON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HONKALA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2020cv06568
Plaintiff: J DOE & A DOE AND THEIR MINORS, JENNIFER BENNETCH, POOR PEOPLE'S ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant: SECRETARY BEN CARSON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and BLM COMPANIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?