Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Derron (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2026cv03072
Plaintiff:
Earl William's Derron
Defendant:
Polis, Wiggings, Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackler v. Chipley
as 3:2025cv00565
Plaintiff:
Clinton Hackler
Defendant:
Shane Chipley, City of Sevierville, Walker Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Hackler
as 25-5672
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NEIL HACKLER
HERR v. LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2025cv00387
Plaintiff:
CAILEN ANTHONY HERR
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF, YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, LANCASTER COUNTY CHIEF OF RECORDS DEPARTMENT OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERR v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2025cv00254
Plaintiff:
CAILEN ANTHONY HERR
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, INVESTIGATOR HACKLER, WARDEN STEBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROANE v. Cheryl Steberger et al
as 5:2024cv04486
Defendant:
JUSTIN HACKLER, JAMAL LEATH, Cheryl Steberger and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAQUIN ROANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hackler
as 6:2024cv00267
Defendant:
Bonnie Hackler
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hackler et al v. Proform Group, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackler
Defendant:
Proform Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Workers Adjustment & Retraining Act
CHIN v. WARFEL et al
as 5:2023cv04220
Plaintiff:
ETHAN ANTHONY CHIN
Defendant:
TONI WARFEL, JUSTIN HACKLER and MICHAEL FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO et al v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv04255
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO, CORRY BROOKS, ETHAN ANTHONY CHIN and others
Defendant:
CHERL STEBERGER, TONI WARFEL and JUSTIN HACKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
