Cases 41 - 50 of 378
Titus Henderson v. Gary Boughton, et al
as 22-2851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BOUGHTON, PETER HAIBREGTTSE, TIM HAINES, Superintendent and others
Haines v. Klinger et al
as 3:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Robert William Haines
Defendant:
C.O. Klinger, C.O. Sable, Officer Krammes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HAINES et al
as 2:2022cv04051
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVID HAINES, DIORIO, CROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Gary Boughton, et al
as 22-2728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BOUGHTON, PETER HAIBREGTTSE, TIM HAINES, Superintendent and others
Gerald Barnes, II v. Heather Karabeika, et al
as 22-35761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD LEROY BARNES II
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER KARABEIKA, Judge and LINDA HAINES, Attorney
Demos v. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Avril Haines, William Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haines v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
David Haines
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01380
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Humphreys v. Wilson et al
as 3:2022cv05628
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Heather Wilson, Brittany Botsel, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Karabeika et al
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II
Defendant:
Judge Heather Karabeika and Attorney Linda Haines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
